Feb/107
Building a hyperlocal website: final thoughts
This is the final post about hyperlocal websites, that started with my own experience with HashBrum, as described in one, two, three posts, and with the special contribution of five sapient minds that work on hyperlocal endeavors. I learned a lot from my own efforts – mine and the rest of the team’s – and also from this reflection. It was interesting to analyze the list of characteristics presented by different people for hyperlocal websites and find common terms, common ideas, a common ground, even in the choice of words. Here’s what i learned, organized around a few main concepts. To understand them better, you should have read the previous posts of this series, but i think this will be quite clear and straight to the point.
Relevance
Why are hyperlocal news websites important? Why do people feel inclined to “backyard news”? Precisely. Proximity is the keyword here, and it’s not only a geographical concept, it’s also about the relationships that a hyperlocal blogger/journalist must have with the community (s)he covers. You have to live there, be a part of it, like Will Perrin said. You’ll beat any other local newspaper because of your knowledge, you know the ground better than them, the real problems, because they are your problems too. And since you are there, you can get to the news faster, and stay on them for a longer period of time, without deadline constraints: you have availability. And will the local media send a reporter for every story you find interesting? Not really, no. Your broken streetlight is not an issue for the general audience, but it is for the people who live in that street: granularity, or , it’s the small stuff that counts.
UX
Another good thing that hyperlocal websites are good at is by providing a better user experience. Innovation and experimentation in storytelling, using maps, multimedia, different ways to look at and navigate through the news. And without the need for a huge investment, because most of the tools to create a website like this are free and open source, so only a small financial investment is required, the real expense here is time. But to be effective, the hyperlocal website’s technology must promote participation, allow people to offer their input, and the users should be able to conform their experience through customization, getting the information they want, the way they want.
Attitude
At the core of hyperlocal behavior is passion. It’s your reality, or at least a reality that is right outside your front door. The level of engagement and commitment hyperlocal news websites have are huge, compared to the average reporter, who is assigned for a story and educated to be detached. Hyperlocal reporters are involved in the story and they can afford to be critical and assertive close to the local authorities, and use their work to improve their community’s living standards and environment. It’s what matters to a few, that becomes really important.
Another relevant characteristic is adaptability. A good hyperlocal website is aware of it’s shortcomings and is constantly looking for new ways to do their work, something quite impossible to do in the bigger, slower structures of traditional media, and their sluggish procedures and bureaucracies. They can be built and developed fast, and still bring added value.
A new market is open for these projects: since it’s about and for the local community, it is also an advertising opportunity for local businesses, who can’t afford ads in the pages of a newspaper. If instructed to develop interaction and user experience like the hyperlocal website should do, there is a lot to get out of this, for local businesses.
The bottom line is, your neighborhood news matter, whether it’s a poorly made manhole, or a broken streetlight, or crime. It’s these bits of information that become important when you are living – or wanting to live – in a neighborhood. And if there’s a way to connect us back to our neighbors, whom we usually don’t know, and join efforts to improve our real, every day life experience, it was well worth it. And if you want to do it, there isn’t much stopping you. All you have to do is to talk to people who live next to you, see what is already being discussed online, and build a space to host the information that matters. All it takes is time, and quick thinking.
When we first thought about HashBrum, we believed we could create a small network of street level information, and let the different communities take part in the process. In the end we leaned towards reporting specific issues neglected by the local media, who didn’t have room in their agendas or the resources to cover them, or do comprehensive follow ups on the developments. It’s the idea that a brief article in local media can be a huge story for a community/hyperlocal website. And do you know what?, sometimes they’re huge for other communities too, that have the same problems, and what seemed to be an isolated event might be a more general issue within society.
With the fragmentation brought by the internet, the rule is no longer defined by the majority. It’’s the individual’s rules and needs that matter, and we can customize them in size, subject and location. With all this power, citizens can start improving the world, starting at their doorsteps. Or just have their garbage collected more often. If you have your own ideas on this, please, do share them in the comment box below. If you aren’t already starting to build your own hyperlocal news thing…
Jan/100
news:rewired – nudges and conclusions
I must confess i hate conferences. Well, i’ve been hating them, since i’ve never been to so many of them in such a short period of time, and because i’m not making the most of attending to these things. Conferences are not only places of discussion and learning with some of the best minds in a specific field, but mostly a place to interact with them, network with like minded people, make new friends, get into someone else’s list of professional contacts. Lately i’ve been feeling like a teenager avoiding all the cool kids. I’m starting to think i’m losing people’s skills, or my charm doesn’t work around here. I come from a different culture, and you brits sometimes don’t make it easy. But some do, actually, as i found out after the end of the conference, over a few beers.
I was approached by John Thompson, publisher and owner of Journalism.co.uk, so, the man in charge of the operations. He kindly put up with my ranting about what i thought Journalism.co.uk could do when covering the Journiverse, while i thanked him for my (nowadays undeserved) presence in their list of the best journalism blogs. John and his team do some of the best work i see related to the industry, and i’m constantly recommending their work. Another huge mistake i keep doing is not having a camera available to interview people, my Samsung Omnia has terrible video and sound quality, so i didn’t even tried, but my conversation with John could have been registered and posted here, instead of having to describe it using just words. Not much multimedia of me…
Other people that i managed to talk to IRL (in real life) for the first time we’re Laura Oliver, from journalism.co.uk, but i failed to meet Judith Townend. I got to “e-talk” with them a bit in the last two years, so it’s easy to have the “i kinda know you” feeling. Another great moment was when I intercepted Andy Dickinson, whom i must convince to taste some Portuguese wines, I owe him a bottle anyway. But if you’ve ever been to these events, you know it’s all three minute conversations, then change counterparts. After three beers in a nearly empty stomach i was feeling like a pinball (so unprofessional of me…) but i got to talk to Dave Lee, Adam Westbrook, Josh Halliday, and Phillip John that i already knew from Birmingham. But it was nice to get to talk to these guys in person, they are what i thought of them: smart and to be followed in their online presences, there is a lot to be learned from them.
It was a great day anyway, and the bullet points were the following:
- journalists can’t do everything, they need to find what they need to know;
- journalists need to be entrepreneurial;
-journalism is changing faster than we can be aware of that;
-journalism is still the same thing as it was before, but there is a plethora of new ways to do it, monetize it, distribute it, work on it;
You should check these websites to get a better picture of what happened during the conference: news:rewired, of course, with all the profiles of the speakers and some accounts on the sessions; Andy Dickinson talks about one of the sessions he attended; Adam Tinworth also reports on the sessions he attended.
Now i’m working on my assignments for the MA and looking for a place to work for the Labs phase next semester. This was a useful event for me, nonetheless, and i might profit from it in the near future. At least that’s what i hope. And if you see me at one of these things, please approach me, i might not recognize you, be offline, or just too shy that day.
Here are some images of the conference.
[UPDATE: Check this list of links for a broader coverage on the event]
Jan/103
news:rewired – the start
Last Thursday i attended the news:rewired event, organized by the great Journalism.co.uk team. I have to say that the source of most of my excitment when i got to the London City University, where the conference was held, was the fact that i’d see in the flesh many of my twitter contacts. But it seems i’m 16 again and i’m not able to engage in a conversation at conference foyers. Being dead tired after a long day, in panic because i’m really late with my assignments for the MA and nearly broke doesn’t help, but i’m always good at finding excuses (you can hire me if you need someone for that). It was a good place to network in a more active way, and i failed. My charm doesn’t seem to work around here. But the presentations were good, the event had a main idea running throughout the day, and the crowd was diverse and knowledgeable about media, with different backgrounds and expertises. And that already made the event a winner.
Looking through my notes, i find some terrific quotes that by themselves define the spirit of the event. “Professor of chaos”, that’s how George Brock, Professor and Head of Journalism at London City University, defined himself. But big events in History are surrounded by chaos, and this one in news industry is no exception. Brock then said we had to be “spaghetti throwers”, which as a foreigner, looks like a great image to me. He then gave way to Kevin Marsh, editor of the BBC College of Journalism, that explained to the audience how the BBC made online the center of their news operation, in the biggest multimedia newsroom in the world. Marsh said the evolution process inside the newsroom was so fast they couldn’t even reflect on what was going on, and he took a great lesson out of that experience: “If you think you know the answer, it’s because you didn’t got the question.”
“Entrepreneurial journalism won’t replace big journalism” could sound like a statement against the main current at news:rewired, but it is a great warning for those who are getting the wrong picture about new media. Marsh defends multimedia skills will not suplant journalistic skills but “they suplement the core skills of journalism”. He said there’s no room for a PanMedia journalist, but for journalists with specific skills. We can think this is a step back in the new media philosophy, but i’m also joining this bandwagon. It’s good to know a bit about everything, but we need to be specialists in something. Kevin Marsh also left some good advices for journo students and pros:
-keep learning;
-think like a journalist when you look at the skill set that you need;
-think about what you do well and how the new skills fit with the old ones;
-if the skill is not working for you, drop it.When you stop innovating you should move on.
And he reinforced these ideas by saying “Skills are means to an end”, we spend too much time talking about applications and not about what they can do. But if God is in the details, he gave a final warning: “Don’t lose sight of the big picture.”
The man is right. Check his keynote in full below.
In the next posts i’ll talk about how the rest of the day went. There is a post about Marsh’s ideas here, but you might want to check Nigel Barlow’s insights too.
Dec/093
Looking back, looking forward | Olhar para trás, ver em frente

|
This is the time of the year where we look back and see how much we have accomplished, and where we are headed, or, at least, when we try to set a route for the next times. I always do that, but nowadays i’m basically going with the flow. Less talking, more doing, that has been my mantra. But since i did a lot of talking (blogging) before about journalism, i wanted to recover a blog post i wrote 20 months ago. I think i wasn’t that far off from the truth, since i’ve been reading a lot of posts from smarter people than i am saying pretty much the same. Here’s a summary: “There are five keypoints where changes must occur. Maybe there are more, but i’ll leave the others to you: Method -> newspapers need to change the way news are gathered and presented; Posture -> newspapers must change their editorial guidelines; Involvement -> newspapers need to interact with the audience, not only regarding them as users or readers, but as people; Investment -> newspapers need to spend money to make money, and charge less to more; Technology -> use technology to make better, faster, unique;” It’s newspaper oriented, but i guess it applies to any medium. Read the whole thing and let me know where i got it right and wrong. Meanwhile, i’ll keep meditating on the path that led me where i am now, a small break for breath on the side of the road. I’ll resume my voyage soon. Happy New Year. |
Esta é aquela altura do ano em que olhamos patra trás e vemos o que conseguimos fazer, e para onde vamos, ou, pelo menos, tentamos estabelecer uma rota para os tempos mais próximos. Eu faço sempre isso, mas hoje em dia ando ao sabor da corrente. Falar menos, fazer mais é o meu mantra actual. Mas já que falei (bloguei) muito antes sobre jornalismo, queria recuperar um post que escrevi há 20 meses atrás. Penso que não estava assim tão longe da verdade, já que tenho lido muitos posts de gente mais inteligente que eu a dizer o mesmo. Aqui fica um pequeno sumário: “Existem cinco pontos-chave onde são necessárias mudanças. Talvez hajam mais, mas vou deixar as outras sugestões para vocês: Método -> Os jornais precisam de alterar a forma como recolhem e apresentam as notícias; Postura -> Os jornais precisam de alterar as suas linhas editoriais; Envolvimento -> Os jornais precisam de interagir com os seus leitores, não olhando para eles como utilizadores mas como pessoas; Investimento -> Os jornais precisam de gastar dinheiro para fazer dinheiro,e cobrar menos a mais; Tecnologia-> Os jornais têm que recorrer à tecnologia para fazer melhor, mais rápido e único;” É sobre jornais, mas acho que se aplica a qualquer meio. Leiam o texto por inteiro e digam-me onde é que acertei e errei. Entretanto, vou continuar a reflectir no caminho que me trouxe até onde estou agora, uma pequena pausa para ganhar fôlego à beira da estrada. Volto a fazer-me ao caminho em breve. Feliz Ano Novo.
|
Dec/094
Portugal: Multimedia & Online Journalism Awards | Prémios de Multimédia e Jornalismo Online
|
Last week, the ObCiber awarded, for the second year, the best online journalism works in Portugal. It’s a good way to recognize and evaluate the state of multimedia and online activity of portuguese media, but the feeling I get is that there is a lot to be done. If we look at the nominees, we see that, basically, only three different major news companies made the cut: Jornal de Notícias, Público and Radio Renascença, which are in fact the ones who are developing multimedia in the newsrooms in a sustainable way. The portuguese public television RTP also made the list, with their effort in mobile journalism during the elections, something that deserves to be analyzed by itself, since it had an experimental side to it. But that will have to stay for later. Here are the winners of this year’s edition:
|
Na semana passada, o Obciber atribuiu pelo segundo ano os prémios para o melhor jornalismo online em Portugal. É uma boa forma de reconhecer e avaliar o estado e a actividade online dos media portugueses, mas sinto que ainda há muito por fazer. Se olharmos para os nomeados, vemos que basicamente apenas três marcas informativas chegaram lá: Jornal de Notícias, Público e Radio Renascença, que são de facto os que estão a desenvolver o multimédia nas redacções de forma sustentada. A RTP também está na lista, com o seu trabalho de jornalismo móvel durante a campanha eleitoral, algo que por si só merece uma análise mais aprofundada, devido ao seu lado experimental. Mas isso vai ter que ficar para outra altura. Eis os vencedores deste ano:
|
|
The most nominated and biggest winner was the daily Jornal de Notícias, one of the top selling newspapers in Portugal. They were practically running by themselves in most categories, so the Overall Excellency in CyberJournalism award was more than expected. They also won in Best Multimedia Story, with a work about the credit crunch and citizen’s debts, and Best InfoGraphics with a work about Poker. Público, last year’s big winner, got the Breaking News award. Radio Renascença, the most heard radio in the country, won in the Video category with a piece about nuns in a monastery (they’re a Catholic radio), rewarding their efforts in the video department, that is one of the most hard working in Portugal, and that has been consistently delivering good works. In college journalism, the Porto’s University news endeavour JornalismoPortoNet took the prize home with the “Porto Adrift” dossier. |
O mais nomeado e o maior vencedor foi o Jornal de Notícias, um dos jornais nacionais com maior circulação. Como concorriam quase sozinhos na maioria das categorias, o prémio de Excelência Geral em Ciberjornalismo era mais do que esperado. Eles também venceram na categoria de Melhor Reportagem Multimédia, com um trabalho sobre o endividamento dos portugueses, e Melhor Infografia com um trabalho sobre Poker. O Público, o maior galardoado no ano passado, venceu em Breaking News. A Rádio Renascença venceu na categoria de Video, com um trabalho sobre freiras num mosteiro (são a rádio católica portuguesa), recompensando o seu investimento no departamento de video, que é um dos que mais e melhor trabalha no país. No jornalismo universitário, o JornalismoPortoNet levou o prémio para casa com o dossier “Porto à deriva”
|
|
Alfredo Leite, deputy director of Jornal de Notícias, told me that these awards are the recognition of the work that the newspaper has been developing, and an “added responsibility, since the Observatory (ObCiber) gathers some of the people we acknowledge as the most competent in Digital Journalism” in Portugal. He claims JN is one of the most solid news websites in the country “though most times we are not seen that way” by a mainstream audience. “It is also the confirmation of a multidisciplinary team that slowly has been integrating in the digital platforms all the journalists and other resources” of the newspaper. In my opinion, there has been an evolution in Portuguese multimedia news but there is a lot to be done. What i hear is that some strategic mistakes have been made in some newsrooms, by appointing people who know nothing about the internet to coordinate multimedia, the neglect of the online towards a dead tree investment, and a demand for quality where there are no minimum working conditions. But that is not journalism, is plain politics. Still, some are trying. And those will be the ones who will succeed. Tell me what you think about these works in the comments. |
Alfredo Leite, director adjunto do Jornal de Notícias disse-me que estes prémios são “o reconhecimento do trabalho que o JN tem vindo a desenvolver, muitas vezes de forma invisível, de consolidação da sua edição digital” e “uma responsabilidade acrescida já que este Observatório reúne algumas das pessoas a quem mais competências reconhecemos e matéria de jornalismo digital no nosso país”. Ele afirma que o JN é “das webs mais sólidas do país, ainda que nem sempre sejamos reconhecidos enquanto tal pelo mainstream.” “É também a afirmação de uma equipa multidisplinar que aos poucos tem integrado na plataforma digital todos os jornalistas e outros recursos do JN.” Na minha opinião, tem-se assistido a uma evolução no jornalismo multimédia em Portugal, mas é preciso fazer mais. Do que ouço, há erros estratégicos a serem cometidos em algumas redacções, que nomeiam gente que não percebe nada de internet para coordenadores de multimédia, há negligência nos conteúdos online em favorecimento do papel, e uma exigência de qualidade onde não há condições mínimas para o fazer. Mas isso não é jornalismo, são politiquices. Mesmo assim, há quem tente. E esses terão sucesso. Digam o que pensam sobre estes trabalhos nos comentários.
|
Oct/090
soitu.es: the end | o fim
|
One of the most interesting news projects going on the web is now closed. The spanish based Soitu.es is gone, after only 22 months after its launch. In between they won two Online News Association awards, a place in the News Museum in Washington, and saw their design distinguished by the Society for News Design. It was interesting, intense, risky, but it failed. Juan Antonio Giner shares in his view on the closing of Soitu the opinion of AFP’s Eric Scherer in Rue89: He says “that there are three lessons to be learned from the death of soitu.es: 1. Don’t depend only from one shareholder (specially if it is a bank) 2. Start small. 3. Don’t depend only from advertising.” For Giner, “soitu.es made all these three mistakes.” I wish the Soitu team the best of luck for the future. |
Um dos projectos informativos mais interessantes na web acabou. O site espanhol Soitu.es fechou apenas 22 meses depois do seu lançamento. Pelo meio ganharam dois prémios da Online News Association, um lugar no News Museum em Washington,e viram o seu design ser reconhecido pela Society of News Design. Foi interessante, intenso, arriscado, mas falhou. Juan Antonio Giner partilha na sua visão do encerramento do Soitu a opinião de Eric Scherer da AFP, no Rue89: Ele diz que “há três lições a retirar da morte do Soitu.es: 1. Não dependam de um uníco accionista (especialmente se for um banco) 2. Comecem pequeno. 3. Não dependam apenas de publicidade”. Para Giner “soitu.es cometeu todos estes erros.” Desejo à equipa do soitu a melhor sorte para o futuro. |
Sep/092
(The Future of) Journalism in Portugal conference | (O Futuro do) Jornalismo em Portugal
Video: Comunicamos
|
If you are in the vicinity of Carregal do Sal and if you would like to join the debate around Journalism in Portugal, then you should attend the conference organized by the Rascunhos school newspaper. A high school newspaper! The organizers, as you can see in the video above, are young, but eager to discuss journalism and present their project. Ricardo Sousa, the smart fellow on the left, invited me a few weeks ago to participate, but i had to decline, and now i feel sorry for it because it looks like it’s going to be good. I was impressed with Ricardo then, when we exchanged emails, but after watching the video i am even more. This guy is going places. I don’t know his partner in the event, Romina Santos, but i know that their team effort will be fruitful, and i can’t express how much i admire them for doing this. They’ll be having from young journalists to journalism teachers, to experienced reporters and newspaper board members. And they’ll take the chance to present the brand new edition of their school newspaper. It looks like it’s going to be a lot of fun, and i will have to watch the video stream to compensate the fact i won’t be there. But i feel good knowing that there are kids willing to do stuff, and get into the debate. The future looks brighter this way.
|
Se estiverem por perto de Carregal do Sal e quiserem entrar num debate sobre o Jornalismo em Portugal, então devem ir à conferência organizada pelo jornal Rascunhos. Um jornal de uma escola secundária! Os organizadores, como podem ver no video acima, são novos mas impacientes por discutir o Jornalismo e apresentar o seu projecto. Ricardo Sousa, o rapaz inteligente do lado esquerdo, convidou-me há umas semanas para o painel, mas tive que recusar, e agora lamento não poder ir, porque parece-me que vai ser bom. Fiquei impressionado com o Ricardo na altura, enquanto trocávamos emails, mas depois de ver o video fiquei ainda mais. Este miúdo vai chegar longe. Não conheço a colega dele, a Romina Santos, mas tenho a certeza que o seu trabalho de equipa irá dar resultados, e não consigo expressar o quanto os admiro por fazerem isto. Eles vão receber desde jovens jornalistas a professores de jornalismo, de repórteres experientes a directores adjuntos de jornais. E vão aproveitar a oportunidade para apresentar o seu jornal de escola, novinho em folha. Soa-me que vai ser divertido, e vou ter que seguir pelo stream de video para compensar a minha falta de comparência. Mas sinto-me bem sabendo que há miúdos com vontade de fazer coisas, e entrarem na discussão. O futuro parece mais brilhante assim. |
JORNALISMO EM PORTUGAL- Debate e apresentação jornal Rascunhos, 11 de Setembro 2009
Programa do Dia:
14h00min – Abertura Solene da Cerimónia
- Intervenção do Presidente da Câmara Municipal de Carregal do Sal, Atílio dos Santos Nunes
- Intervenção do Director do Rascunhos e Director da ESCSAL, Prof. Hermínio Marques
- Intervenção da Co-Editora Principal do Rascunhos, Romina Santos
14h20min – Ínicio da Sessão de Palestras
- “Um Jornal Escolar no Século XXI. Como? – Apresentação do Jornal”, Ricardo Sousa – 15 minutos
- “Como se faz um bom Jornal?”, João Simão – 30 minutos
- “Comunicação Oral Começa nas Escolas”, Carla Marques – 30 minutos
- “Ética no Jornalismo”, Daniel Ricardo – 20 minutos
16h00min – Ínicio do Debate “Jornalismo em Portugal”
- Paulo Querido, via Skype, Jornalista Freelance Multimédia
- Vanessa Quitério, no local, Estudante de Jornalismo / Estagiária
- Paulo Ferreira, no local, Jornalista, Editor Adjunto do Jornal Público
- Bruno Faria, no local, Jornalista, Repórter para o “Jornal i”
- Daniel Ricardo, no local, Jornalista, Editor Executivo da Visão
- João Simão, no local, Professor de Jornalismo, Editor da UTADtv
- Ainda em aberto a possibilidade de participação do Director do Diário de Notícias
moderam Ricardo Sousa e Rita Ferreira, Jornal Rascunhos.
18h15min – Final Oficial do Debate. Nota de Encerramento
Agradece a Presença e Fecha a Sessão:
- Ricardo Sousa, Co-Editor Principal Jornal Rascunhos
Sep/090
Internet Manifesto | Manifesto Internet
|
Hey Media, what’s that sound? Every knows what’s going down…but you. This is the feeling i get reading this Internet Manifesto, created by 15 journalists and bloggers as a reaction to the Hamburg Declaration, in which major publishers “advocate strongly urgent improvements in the protection of intellectual property on the Internet”, and “disagree with those who maintain that freedom of information is only established when everything is available at no cost”. Yes, if you want it to be free you can’t have it for free. And public domain facts go under a copyright license (i just delight on wondering the variety of consequences this might bring about). Besides, they would never take profit from free content, created by others, and never without compensating them (or giving them credit). Though this might seem a specific discussion it is an important one, and this Manifesto comes not only as an answer to a different view on the Internet, but also as a guide to understand the basic principles of it, that media moguls have been failing to grasp for so long. And like playground bullies, they’re trying to change the rules of the game, just because they’re losing. Mr.Media Mogul, read below the first point of the Manifesto and then go here to read the rest. And the rest of you, what do you make of it? (Referrals stolen mercilessly from the great Remixtures blog) |
Ei Media, o que se passa? Toda a gente sabe…menos vocês. Esta é a sensação que tenho ao ler este Manifesto Internet (trazido para o Português pelo Pedro Teichgräber e Paulo Querido) criado por 15 jornalistas e bloggers como reacção à Declaração de Hamburgo, na qual os grades editores defendem “vigorosamente melhorias urgentes na protecção da propriedade intelectual na Internet”, e discordam “com aqueles que defendem que a liberdade de informaçãosó é conseguida quando tudo está disponível gratuitamente”. Sim,se querem que seja livre não pode ser grátis. E factos de domínio público ficam debaixo de direitos de autor (delicio-me a imaginar a variedade de consequências que isto podia trazer). Além disso, eles nunca lucraram com conteúdo livre criado por outros e sem lhes pagar (ou lhes dar o devido crédito). Apesar desta discussão parecer um pouco específica, é muito importante, e este Manifesto vem não só como resposta a uma perspectiva diferente sobre a Internet, mas também coo um guia para compreender os seus princípios básicos, que os barões dos média não têm conseguido compreender. E como rufias de recreio, querem mudar as regras do jogo apenas porque estão a perder. Sr.Barão dos Media, leia o primeiro ponto abaixo deste Manifesto e veja o resto aqui. E vocês, o que pensam disto? (Referências roubadas sem dó ao grande blog Remixtures) |
Internet Manifesto (ler versão portuguesa)
1. The Internet is different.
It produces different public spheres, different terms of trade and different cultural skills. The media must adapt their work methods to today’s technological reality instead of ignoring or challenging it. It is their duty to develop the best possible form of journalism based on the available technology. This includes new journalistic products and methods.
(Referências roubadas sem dó ao grande blog







