<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why i&#8217;m not enthusiastic about NewsTilt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alexgamela.com/blog/2010/04/19/why-im-not-enthusiastic-about-newstilt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alexgamela.com/blog/2010/04/19/why-im-not-enthusiastic-about-newstilt/</link>
	<description>bits, hands and feeds on digital media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:16:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Gamela</title>
		<link>http://www.alexgamela.com/blog/2010/04/19/why-im-not-enthusiastic-about-newstilt/#comment-794</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Gamela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 14:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexgamela.com/blog/?p=3194#comment-794</guid>
		<description>Hi Paul, thanks for the feeddback. I have no doubts about your commitment and i praise your effort, this type of endeavors are needed, and i hope yours becomes successful. But this is my opinion, whether you like it or not, though i admit i could have been more clear about what i think NewsTilt lacks to really make a difference. 

My reaction was caused by the inexistence of multimedia features, all i saw was words, and i hope you manage to cover that in a near future. That is what i meant with a new model of journalism, it is more than words. The community factor is really important and i&#039;m glad you&#039;re tackling that, but i don&#039;t get excited about what i see in your website. Yet.

And i&#039;m not expecting the second coming of Christ, because i believe that it is not an outside element that will save good journalism, but journalists themselves if they try to go beyond the worn out models and practices. I don&#039;t misunderstand the problems journalists are facing today, but i think you misunderstood two things: this is a personal opinion, and i can be wrong and don&#039;t have problems admitting it if it comes to it; you didn&#039;t even bother to understand who i am, what is my relevance, and what i have done so far in journalism, for journalism, because i&#039;m not the kind of guy who sits in front of the computer and trashes other people&#039;s work for fun. You are doing something useful, i just think it could be better. And i&#039;m sure that in time it will, you sound passionate and that is essential. 

Good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Paul, thanks for the feeddback. I have no doubts about your commitment and i praise your effort, this type of endeavors are needed, and i hope yours becomes successful. But this is my opinion, whether you like it or not, though i admit i could have been more clear about what i think NewsTilt lacks to really make a difference. </p>
<p>My reaction was caused by the inexistence of multimedia features, all i saw was words, and i hope you manage to cover that in a near future. That is what i meant with a new model of journalism, it is more than words. The community factor is really important and i&#8217;m glad you&#8217;re tackling that, but i don&#8217;t get excited about what i see in your website. Yet.</p>
<p>And i&#8217;m not expecting the second coming of Christ, because i believe that it is not an outside element that will save good journalism, but journalists themselves if they try to go beyond the worn out models and practices. I don&#8217;t misunderstand the problems journalists are facing today, but i think you misunderstood two things: this is a personal opinion, and i can be wrong and don&#8217;t have problems admitting it if it comes to it; you didn&#8217;t even bother to understand who i am, what is my relevance, and what i have done so far in journalism, for journalism, because i&#8217;m not the kind of guy who sits in front of the computer and trashes other people&#8217;s work for fun. You are doing something useful, i just think it could be better. And i&#8217;m sure that in time it will, you sound passionate and that is essential. </p>
<p>Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Biggar</title>
		<link>http://www.alexgamela.com/blog/2010/04/19/why-im-not-enthusiastic-about-newstilt/#comment-792</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Biggar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alexgamela.com/blog/?p=3194#comment-792</guid>
		<description>This is an unfortunate piece. Check out the inconsistency between

Well, if you are promoting writers, it’s ok, if you are promoting a “new model of journalism” then it’s not enough.

and

NewsTilt falls short of what a journalist centered project should be in 2010.

To be clear: we are 100% journalist centered. They are our customers, our clients, our raison-d&#039;etre. The &quot;new model of journalism&quot; is that - centered on journalists, and their interactions with their communities. If you expected the next coming of Christ, I think you misunderstand the real problems that journalists face today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an unfortunate piece. Check out the inconsistency between</p>
<p>Well, if you are promoting writers, it’s ok, if you are promoting a “new model of journalism” then it’s not enough.</p>
<p>and</p>
<p>NewsTilt falls short of what a journalist centered project should be in 2010.</p>
<p>To be clear: we are 100% journalist centered. They are our customers, our clients, our raison-d&#8217;etre. The &#8220;new model of journalism&#8221; is that &#8211; centered on journalists, and their interactions with their communities. If you expected the next coming of Christ, I think you misunderstand the real problems that journalists face today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

